Christianity 101

I have a very intimate relationship with the missionary enterprise. I am a missionary convert, I became a missionary, and I now work at a school for missionary children. Missionaries are beautiful people who endeavor to bring Christianity to foreign lands. It is an exciting thing to live at the intersection of missionary activity because one does not spout systematic theology with those unfamiliar with the gospel—you always start at the beginning: God loves you and wants to have a relationship with you.

Simple. Pure. Compelling.

Missionaries do not coerce people at gunpoint to convert to Christianity. (Well, they used to, but we know better now.) We try our best to live out the beauty of the gospel so as to woo people into a relationship with God. 

It is an invitation, never a demand.

They do, however, teach you at missions control center that at some point you have to start introducing the concept of commitment—to God, to the church, and to the rest of the world. First, it’s God loves you, and next thing you know it’s the Cost of Discipleship. It’s all fun and games until anti-Nazi dissidents show up.

I think western missionaries may have a blind spot when it comes to communicating love. In western culture and certainly in the English language, the word ‘love’ has been diluted into mere affection, a fleeting emotion. Therefore, western missionaries find it is necessary to reinforce that a Love relationship with God is covenantal and requires a commitment. In many cultures, love cannot be separated from commitment, and sacrifice is implicit in any meaningful relationship.

Loving commitment looks very different from toxic control. The very moment one party crosses the line from eliciting covenantal love to demanding entitled obedience, the relationship is in jeopardy. I write in A Love Worth Celebrating, that love can only be authentic when there exists a real possibility of losing it. And in this broken world with imperfect people, we do often lose our greatest loves. Wives walk away from husbands. Children turn their backs on parents. Faithful members exit the doors of church.

We lose love because we don’t know how to wait patiently for reciprocity. We want to control the other—make them do what we know is best for them. And as we feel the relationship slipping between our fingers, we tighten our control grip and spiral further down the vicious cycle.

Obedience is conditional upon anThis is not the way God loves. God’s love is cruciform in Jesus. God calls us to give everything of ourselves, but only in response to the question,

“Do you love me?” If you love me, feed my sheep. If you love me, you may face trials. If you love me, give your life.

Obedience is conditional upon an unconditional love.

This is the nature of the gracious call I received at the beginning of my faith journey. It is radical that God would ask of me, a puny human being, to love God back. It is breathtaking to be given autonomy by a God who gave God’s power away so completely on a cross.

But how the Body of Christ has forgotten Christianity 101 when we turn around and exert dominance and control over others. When we build hierarchy and demand submission to church authorities. When we silence dissent and cover up abuse and turn our eyes from the suffering of victims. When we deal out harsh punishments in the name of meting consequences, as if we are little gods with our little judge hammers believing we are righteous all while destroying lives.

Just as our relationship with God is a delicate dance of reciprocal, covenantal love, so too is any relationship between members of the church and with the church. We can desire wholeness for others. We can believe strongly what wholeness means for members of a community. But we cannot impose behavior modifications on autonomous human beings—this violates covenantal love.

Love does not dominate. Love is not a bully. Love will not hoard power, but gives it away.



  • M Diaz

    “God loves you and wants to have a relationship with you.”

    Since you are a missionary, then I am to assume you deal with non believers all the time, right? Ok, so as a non believer here is your chance to persuade me. In order for me to take anything you say about a supreme authority over everyone seriously can you present the criteria that you use to establish this idea called god isn’t really you appealing to a higher sense of yourself?

    • Hi M, I can’t answer all of your questions, as good as they are, because I am not really in the business of persuading anyone. You can read my piece, “How I Kissed Evangelism Goodbye” to get to know a bit more of my attitude towards prosletyzing:

      I don’t claim to understand everything Jesus said and taught, but I do find his sacrifice on the cross to shape everything about who God is – that if there is a God, God is one who does that: loves so unconditionally to the point of death. That compels me, but I would not force you or anyone else to feel the same way. You are free to believe or not believe. Thank you for your comment.

      • M Diaz

        If you call yourself a missionary you are in the business of persuading people. With all due respect, I think you are trying to take the easy way out of owning what that word means, yet oddly enough you resort to labeling yourself a missionary, Quite frankly I find that to be rather odd.

        I find the idea of the cross is immoral as abandoning ones culpability is the most irresponsible thing anyone can do.

        Being that you claim to know about god, what is the standard that establishes who and what god is? Is it tradition, fear, ignorance, or imagination? Maybe it’s a combination of those things… But I can’t think of any other standard that can establish who and what this idea called god is.

        I will leave you with this. Being that this planet is full of those who believe in this idea called god which is dependent on their own personal standard, isn’t that a disservice to humanity rather than helping it to progress?

  • M Diaz

    “Love does not dominate. Love is not a bully. Love will not hoard power, but gives it away.”

    This confuses me when I compare these humanistic ideas with the teachings of a religion that is established on the principles of tribalism. Jesus condemns those who do not believe, Jesus told his disciples to wipe the dust off of their feet if they were rejected. Doesn’t Jesus say unbelievers are wicked and evil and are already condemned for their disbelief, how is that, claiming one is condemned, not resorting to dominate the choices ppl make for themselves, how is that not bullying one for rejecting Jesus? How is that not an appeal to gain power over unbelievers in order to manipulate them into believing…How in the world do you associate all that with giving love away?

%d bloggers like this: